You are currently browsing the K.L. Gore’s Blog weblog archives for the day 17. October 2011.
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Sep | Nov » | |||||
| 1 | ||||||
| 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
| 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
| 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 |
| 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | |||||
- Blog Posts (31)
- Contact (1)
- How To book reviews about writing (3)
- Links (1)
- Reviews & Interviews (1)
- Writing Advice (18)
- 25. February 2012: Coming soon: New Look and New Content
- 24. January 2012: Self-Publishing Picture Books?
- 6. January 2012: CICADA is publishing my short story!
- 10. December 2011: I’m Not Proud: All the Wrong Ways to Deal with an Agent
- 27. November 2011: Why I Struggle While Reading Self-Published Work
- 7. November 2011: Hiatus on my Education
- 26. October 2011: Should You Pay to Have Your Work Critiqued?
- 17. October 2011: The New Face of Publishing?
- 4. October 2011: Revision 411
- 9. September 2011: Sentimental Writing
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- March 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- May 2009
Archive for 17. October 2011
The New Face of Publishing?
17. October 2011 by Gore Wehner.
Something new is happening to literature. Anyone can get published without upfront costs. Before, authors were limited to either going with traditional, POD, or vanity presses. Now anyone can upload their work to a variety of on-line venues such as Kindle, the Nook, Smashwords, and many more with little to no upfront costs.
So what do we need publishing houses for?
I know people fed up with traditional presses, citing receiving many rejections over what they deem is quality writing, or admonishing the long period of waiting between acceptance and getting their books on the bookshelf. Plus I’ve heard grumbling over agent and publishing fees that “might have” been theirs had they avoided going the long route of submitting. After all, they argue, we’re doing all the marketing ourselves anyway.
So what is a writer to do?
Here’s my take. E-publishing is definitely a valid way to go. But it’s similar to an agent or editor slush pile. Someone has to find it to read it, and if it isn’t well done, the reader will put down the book and not bother reading anything else you write. Ever. (Although an agent or editor might give you a second chance someday.)
In all honesty, too many e-book writers put out material that isn’t very good. Traditional publishing houses have knowledgeable editors. Editors that can turn a good book into a great book. If you have a long way to go with writing, they will turn you down. This may mean you aren’t ready to share your work with the world yet. It could be a pretty decent benchmark of where you stand as a writer.
But they also may turn you down if they feel you won’t make them enough money. After all, publishing is a business. Physical books cost money to make. And your editor needs to be paid for his or her time and service.
So it may have nothing to do with skill as much as marketability. This is why I’m happy e-books are out there and anyone can publish through them. But this may change publishing as we know it.
As readers, we’ll have to muddle through the bad writing to find the well done books. Eventually people may become wary of self-published work and search for books published by established, well-known imprints.
Or, readers may tolerate poor writing. Perhaps not even realize the craftsmanship is missing. Will this “dumb down” America? Will our standards of literature change?
Only time will tell. But until then, I applaud the efforts of those e-publishing, but respect those sticking to traditional publishing as well.
Posted in Blog Posts | No Comments »